Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse By tag

Security as a Strategy (SaaS)

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Public Apathy for Security Issues

Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

I’ve had a nagging question for some time now. It comes to mind when an incident happens like the one in Estonia (see Wired magazine: http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-09/ff_estonia). I read the aforementioned article and thought,  "My God, if this was done on U.S. soil we’d have an international incident on our hands! The press would have a field day if another country tried to bring a halt out to our financial systems.”  If I’m thinking this, then surely more people are equally amazed and intrigued as I am, right?

 It turns out, maybe not--at least not in the numbers I would have expected.  Granted I don’t watch TV, (I do have a Netflix account but I do not subscribe to any cable service, by choice) but there was hardly a whisper outside tech circles about this particular incident.

That being said, when one takes a step back and looks at the big picture, this seems to be a common theme. Cyber crime just doesn’t draw the attention that physical crimes do.  I believe the biggest problem is an apparent apathy for technological crimes. It’s what we could call "Darfur Syndrome".

By this I mean we as a people disconnect from that which we cannot relate to. Identifying and caring about something small and substantial is easy, like a friend or family member for example. But when the number of people grows and the common bond becomes less apparent the personal connection is lost and disinterest begins to take hold.

We don’t “see” cyber crime. We see figures and definitions that mean little as we have no context for them. We can put armed robbery in context. It's right there on the tv screen--masked men with guns and hostages challenging our basic fears. A DNS attack on a server in a small European country that one may or may not know of doesn't have the same effect. While physical harm in the first instance is daunting, few people can relate to the devastating effect of stolen identity. 

So I pose a question to those reading this post. How do we get an average person to care about security issues we all face but few pay any attention to? What can we do to raise the seriousness of such crimes? 

Comments

In the same way we deal with problems like what you term the "Darfur Syndrome", we should deal with these issues; that is, put a face on it that people can relate to. So what if a DNS server was attacked in some far away country. Seriously, do you think if we don't care about the murder of a common citizen in a far away country, do you think they are going to care about something called a DNS Server? What is the end, personal ramification to someone. Draw out the examples of such incidents to their logical end and show non-tech people how this could affect them, and I think you could do a lot to solve the problem you raise. People are so much more connected (technologically speaking) than they realize. A military helicopter flying over a community 1000's of miles away doesn't make a sound over my head. But the sound foreign hackers on the prowl makes it all the way up to my front door (my firewall) and hopefully no further. that same sound is making its way into home computers everywhere who are not protected. it is a shame.
Posted @ Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:40 PM by Jim
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics